Lithia Chrysler Dodge Jeep Ram Fiat of Helena
3377 E US Highway 12
Helena, MT 59601

Compare the2026 Jeep WranglerVS 2026 Chevrolet Blazer

2026 Jeep Wrangler
2026 Chevrolet Blazer

Safety

For enhanced safety, the front and rear seat shoulder belts of the Jeep Wrangler have pretensioners to tighten the seatbelts and eliminate dangerous slack in the event of a collision and force limiters to limit the pressure the belts will exert on the passengers. The Chevrolet Blazer doesn’t offer pretensioners for its rear seat belts.

To provide maximum traction and stability on all roads, Full-Time Four-Wheel Drive is standard on the Wrangler. But it costs extra on the Blazer.

When descending a steep, off-road slope, the Wrangler Automatic’s standard Hill-descent Control allows you to creep down safely. The Blazer doesn’t offer Hill-descent Control.

Both the Wrangler and the Blazer have standard driver and passenger frontal airbags, front side-impact airbags, side-impact head airbags, height adjustable front shoulder belts, plastic fuel tanks, four-wheel antilock brakes, traction control, electronic stability systems to prevent skidding, rearview cameras, available crash mitigating brakes, daytime running lights, blind spot warning systems, rear parking sensors and rear cross-path warning.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration does 35 MPH front crash tests on new vehicles. In this test, results indicate that the Jeep Wrangler is safer than the Chevrolet Blazer:

Wrangler

Blazer

Passenger

STARS

4 Stars

4 Stars

HIC

281

313

Chest Compression

.6 inches

.8 inches

Neck Injury Risk

38%

43%

Neck Compression

102 lbs.

140 lbs.

New test not comparable to pre-2011 test results. More stars = Better. Lower test results = Better.

Warranty

The Wrangler’s corrosion warranty is unlimited miles longer than the Blazer’s (unlimited vs. 100,000 miles).

Reliability

The Wrangler has a solid front axle with a floating power axle for durability that the Blazer AWD’s independent front suspension and exposed front driveshafts don’t offer.

To reliably power the ignition and other systems and to recharge the battery, the Wrangler has a standard 240-amp alternator (220-amp - Wrangler 392). The Blazer’s standard 170-amp alternator and largest (V6 FWD) 155-amp alternator aren’t as powerful.

Engine

The Wrangler has more powerful engines than the Blazer:

Horsepower

Torque

Wrangler 2.0 turbo 4-cylinder

270 HP

295 lbs.-ft.

Wrangler 3.6 DOHC V6

285 HP

260 lbs.-ft.

Wrangler Moab 392 6.4 V8

470 HP

470 lbs.-ft.

Blazer 2.0 turbo 4-cylinder

228 HP

258 lbs.-ft.

Blazer 3.6 DOHC V6

308 HP

270 lbs.-ft.

As tested in Car and Driver the Wrangler Moab 392 6.4 V8 is faster than the Chevrolet Blazer V6 (automatics tested):

Wrangler

Blazer

Zero to 60 MPH

4 sec

6.3 sec

Zero to 100 MPH

11.7 sec

17 sec

5 to 60 MPH Rolling Start

5.1 sec

6.4 sec

Passing 30 to 50 MPH

2.8 sec

3.1 sec

Passing 50 to 70 MPH

3.5 sec

4.6 sec

Quarter Mile

12.8 sec

15 sec

Speed in 1/4 Mile

104 MPH

94 MPH

Fuel Economy and Range

Regenerative brakes improve the Wrangler 2.0 Turbo’s fuel efficiency by converting inertia back into energy instead of wasting it. The Blazer doesn’t offer a regenerative braking system.

Environmental Friendliness

In its Green Vehicle Guide, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) rates the Jeep Wrangler higher (6 out of 10) than the Chevrolet Blazer (4 to 6). This means the Wrangler produces up to 12.1 pounds less smog-producing pollutants than the Blazer every 15,000 miles.

Transmission

The Wrangler offers a manual transmission for better acceleration, control and sportiness. The Blazer doesn’t offer a manual transmission.

The Wrangler 392’s launch control uses engine electronics to hold engine RPM’s precisely in order to provide the most stable and rapid acceleration possible, using all of the available traction. The Blazer doesn’t offer launch control.

Brakes and Stopping

For better stopping power the Wrangler’s brake rotors are larger than those on the Blazer:

Wrangler

Blazer

Front Rotors

12.9 inches

12.64 inches

Rear Rotors

12.9 inches

12.4 inches

Opt Rear Rotors

14 inches

The Wrangler Moab 392’s standard front and rear disc brakes are vented to help dissipate heat for shorter stops with less fading. The rear discs on the Blazer are solid, not vented.

Tires and Wheels

For better traction, the Wrangler has larger standard tires than the Blazer (245/75R17 vs. 235/65R18). The Wrangler 4-door Moab 392/Xteme 35’s tires are larger than the largest tires available on the Blazer (315/70R17 vs. 265/45R21).

The Wrangler has a standard full size spare tire so a flat doesn’t interrupt your trip. A full size spare isn’t available on the Blazer; it requires you to depend on a temporary spare, which limits mileage and speed before replacement.

Suspension and Handling

The Wrangler has standard front and rear gas-charged shocks for better control over choppy roads. The Blazer’s suspension doesn’t offer gas-charged shocks.

The Wrangler Rubicon has an active front sway bar, which helps keep it flat and controlled during cornering, but disconnects at lower speeds to smooth the ride and offer greater off-road suspension articulation. This helps keep the tires glued to the road on-road and off. The Blazer doesn’t offer an active sway bar system.

For a smoother ride and more stable handling, the Wrangler 4-door’s wheelbase is 5.7 inches longer than on the Blazer (118.4 inches vs. 112.7 inches).

The Wrangler’s front to rear weight distribution is more even (52.2% to 47.4%) than the Blazer’s (60.1% to 39.9%). This gives the Wrangler more stable handling and braking.

For better maneuverability, the Wrangler 2-door’s turning circle is 6 feet tighter than the Blazer’s (32.7 feet vs. 38.7 feet).

For greater off-road capability the Wrangler 2-door has a 2.2 inches greater minimum ground clearance than the Blazer LT (9.7 vs. 7.5 inches), allowing the Wrangler to travel over rougher terrain without being stopped or damaged. The Wrangler Rubicon 4-door Xtreme 35’s minimum ground clearance is 5.3 inches higher than on the Blazer RS (12.9 vs. 7.6 inches).

Chassis

The Wrangler 4-door is 3.5 inches shorter than the Blazer, making the Wrangler easier to handle, maneuver and park in tight spaces.

Cargo Capacity

The Wrangler 4-door has a much larger cargo volume with its rear seat up than the Blazer with its rear seat up (31.7 vs. 30.5 cubic feet). The Wrangler 4-door has a much larger cargo volume with its rear seat folded than the Blazer with its rear seat folded (72.4 vs. 64.2 cubic feet).

The Wrangler’s rear cargo window opens separately from the rest of the left swing out door to allow quicker loading of small packages. The Blazer’s rear cargo window doesn’t open.

Towing

The Wrangler’s minimum standard towing capacity is much higher than the Blazer’s (2000 vs. 1500 pounds). Maximum trailer towing in the Chevrolet Blazer is only 4500 pounds. The Wrangler 4-door offers up to a 5000 lbs. towing capacity.

Servicing Ease

The engine in the Wrangler is mounted longitudinally (North-South), instead of sideways, as in the Blazer. This makes it easier to service and maintain, because there are no rear spark plugs and the accessory belts are in front.

Ergonomics

The Wrangler’s speed-sensitive wipers speed up when the vehicle does, so that the driver doesn’t have to continually adjust the speed of the wipers. The Blazer’s manually variable intermittent wipers have to be constantly adjusted.

Model Availability

The Jeep Wrangler JL comes in four door and soft top bodystyles; the Chevrolet Blazer isn’t available as a soft top.

Recommendations

Motor Trend selected the Wrangler as their 2019 Sport Utility of the Year. The Blazer has never been chosen.

The Jeep Wrangler outsold the Chevrolet Blazer by almost two to one during 2024.

Lithia Chrysler Dodge Jeep Ram Fiat of Helena | 3377 E US Highway 12 Helena, MT 59601

© 1999 - 2026 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved.

Powered by Lithia